Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Two Republicans Step Forward to Challenge Congressman Brian Baird in 2010

The blog of the Northwest Progressive Institute is reporting that two challengers for Brian Baird's seat in the Washington Third Congressional District have now emerged. They are Jon Russell and David Castillo.

Click here to read NPIs coverage of these two.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

From Dan Roy: Normandy, June 7, 2009

From Dan's email message.

Ann and I attended the  65 th Anniversary Memorial of the Normandy invasion, "D" Day on June 7, at the American Cemetery in Normandy, Omaha Beach. We joined about 50 Democrats Abroad at this this event that included speeches by Presidents of the US and France and Prime Ministers of Great Britain and Canada. Earlier in the week, we were able to take a tour of the four landing beaches and were able to speak to some of the veterans. It was  inspiring to listen them speak about their experiences.The lesson that  we were left with is that we should never forgot what happened there, the price for freedom and liberation of Europe.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Secretary's Minutes to be presented at 6-27-09 meeting

Fellow Members,
The last meeting of the 35th LD Democrats was On April 29th, 2009 at the Shelton Timberland Library. The meeting was called to order at 6:02pm by Daryl Daugs. The minutes of the February 14th meeting were approved unanimously. The Bylaws Committee report was given by Committee Chair Greg Case who deferred to Committee Secretary Linda Thomson. The sad news was given that John Gideon had passed away. The Treasurers report was given and we have $580 in the bank. The State committee report was given by Dan Roy and Adrienne Amar. They explained that 11 of the 35 proposed resolutions passed during the state committee meeting. PCO report was given and we now have 65 PCOs in the 35th LD who are Democrats. Rep. Fred Finn (D-Oly.), Rep. Kathy Haigh (D-Shel.) and Sen. Tim Sheldon (D-Pot.) gave a report of the session that just wrapped up in Olympia. Each expressed gratitude of the other legislatures and the working relationship that they have. A raffle was held. The meeting adjourned at 7:53pm.
Our next meeting will be June 27th, 2009 at the Belfair Timberland Library at 1 pm.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Case

Friday, June 19, 2009

From the Chair of the Washington 35th LD Democrats

Change is coming to the 35th! Our loss, Bremerton’s gain.

Congratulations to Daryl Daugs on his recently announced candidacy for the vacant Bremerton mayoral position. Daryl’s tenure with the LD was brief but innovative and productive. He felt it was necessary to resign the position in order to devote his full time and energy to the demands of conducting a major campaign and we wish him the best in his pursuit of this important office.

Now that I have moved from my role as Vice Chair to assume the office of Chair, let me briefly introduce myself. My husband, Larry and I moved to the Bremerton area in early 2003 when he was transferred here to help set up a new project for the Electric Boat Division of General Dynamics. At the time, I was teaching both on-line and residency based courses for the International Programs Center, as well as grad level courses in the MBA program of the Graduate Studies Center for Empire State College, Saratoga Springs, NY, a part of the SUNY system. Fortunately, my work was easily transportable, although it did require a great deal of travel to the Mediterranean region, Lebanon, and to Upstate New York. Since that time, I’ve coauthored several papers in my primary research interest, the topic of personality traits and how they affect our overall behaviors, particularly our leadership styles. As of the end of July, I will be retiring from teaching, but not from my research and consulting interests—but now that I’m involved in political activities, my research interests have grown to include questions associated with the connection between personality traits and political philosophies.

My focus for the 35th LD Democrats during the next several months is completely single minded and can be described in one word. Funding! As an organization, we must devote off-election years to raising funds for our candidates’ next election cycle. Our primary annual fundraiser is the August picnic, but our income from that event doesn’t begin to meet our total fundraising needs. If we are to maintain a strong Democratic representation in at the state level we must assure the re-elections of Representatives Kathy Haigh and Fred Finn, along with Senator Tim Sheldon. During the next few months you will be recruited to participate in this crucial function of the organization.

Thank you in advance for your continuing support of the 35th LD Democrats. I look forward to working with you to help keep Democrats in Olympia.

- NANCY FRANK
Chair, Washington 35th Legistlative District Democrats

LET’S HAVE A PARTY

We have so much to celebrate, why not have a party? A fundraising party for the 35thLD. Every host and participant in these events had a wonderful time while contributing to our local Democratic 35thLD.

We are all so busy (and poor) during the national elections that now is the time to make our local party financially strong.

Please think about having a $20/person backyard BBQ this summer or a $50/person fundraiser in your home. Maybe an ice cream social.

Fundraising is an important part of our party organization, so talk to friends and spouses and see what fits you the best. But do something! If we wait for others to do it, nothing happens.

Our candidates deserve to have a strong and vibrant local party organization. We cannot rely on any other party organization to maintain our presence. It is up to us, plain and simple.

So, why not have a party and have fun while benefiting our local organization!?!

Please contact: 360-337-1013 to make a date for a party.

Organizing for OFA's National Health Care Day of Service

Thank goodness the Hamiltons have been healthy since we returned to the US. And thank goodness we are now both on Medicare - because we have gone years without US health insurance. When overseas we could pay easily for care in baht, pesos, or nothing in France and Italy! All I can say that for the sake of my children, and your children, and for the health of our country as a whole, I am driven to work on Organizing for America's health care reform campaign.

One micro-enterprise project I worked on in Bangladesh was called "WEEH" ("Women's Empowerment through Employment and Health"). If you have a workforce of five people making snacks, or weaving, or sewing - and one of your workers gets sick, that is 20% of your workforce. Down goes productivity. The donors realized that to ensure high productivity, workers had to have health insurance and regular check ups. So the health care that was provided focused on wellness and prevention. It was proactive, not reactive. Well, the OFA Health Care Reform team has prepared a 63 page report on the effects of our unhealthy and stressed workforce on our county. The link is www.whitehouse.gov/blog/The-Economic-Case-for-Health-Care-Reform . There is a summary!

So that is why we all need to support health care reform events before, during and after June 27 - a national day of health care service. As the OFA 6CD captain for the health care campaign, we are organizing eight or more events in the 6th.
  • Phone Call Rally, Tacoma, June 26, 8 pm.
  • "Health Screening" at the Belfair Farmers Market , June 27, 10-2
  • The Daryl Daugs BBQ and Healthy Food Drive at Evergreen Park, June 27, at 5
  • Health Care Information Booth at Olde Time Car Show in Shelton, all day, June 28
  • Sick Around the World showings: Port Townsand, Shelton, Port Angeles
  • Health Care Survey and GH Dems Float, Pirate Daze in Westport, the weekend of June 27-28
  • Health Care Rally Monday, June 29, Tacoma, Norm Dicks Office
Please let me know how you can help. Register an event on line. Come as a guest. Make calls. We must pass health care legislation that is affordable, allows us to choose providers, and covers all of us.

GOBAMA!

- MARCIA HAMILTON
marciahamilton@msn.com
360-275-6701

Americorps and National Service Revisited

Most of us have heard about the expansion of the Americorps Program. It is not merely an expansion however, but a complete overhaul.

The Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act reauthorizes the Corporation of National & Community Service and its programs (including Americorps) through 2014. This is a major change in itself. From its inception 17 years ago, Americorps has not seen any changes in the budget, therefore, no ability to expand or change any of the focus. Americorps has been authorized year to year and there were many years where its very survival was in question.

When President Clinton first signed the Act into law, most Republicans were against it. However, in 2000 when George W. Bush was elected he received 49 letters from the governor's of every state but one. North or South Dakota, I forget which one. These governors recognized the overwhelming contributions of Americorps within their states. He continued the program, but it has been in the October budget yearly thereby calling into question whether it would be continued from one year into the other.

By reauthorizing the Act into 2014 it makes the goals, vision and progress much easier to set forth. By expanding the funding and benefits, the Obama administration is advancing its goals for national/community service.

First, there is projected to be an increase of 333% over the current 75,000 members over the next 9 years. To accomplish this, the budget will increase from $800 million/year to 4 billion/year.

There is to be a change in national focus where emphasis is most desired. The refocused priority areas fall into 6 major funding groups. The Education Corps, Healthy Futures Corps, Clean Energy Corps, Veterans Corps, Opportunity Corps and the National Service program are those six.

There are many ways the Obama administration is appealing to the huge number of baby-boomers who are retiring and able to contribute. There will be an increase in the Education Award from the current $4725 to $5350. Eligibility for the Foster Grandparent and Senior Corps programs is being expanded by lowering the qualifying age from 60 to 55 and older. For those 55 and older, they have the option to transfer their Education Award to their children and grandchildren. There will be changes on the limit of the terms that will allow individuals to receive up to the value of two full-time education awards.

There will be a Summer of Service Program for 6-12 graders. There will be an increase in maximum funding from $12.6 thousand to $18 thousand per member service year.

As you can see, this is an immense change to the program and offers great incentives for the older generation to continue to aid the younger generation while contributing to their community and nation. A generational compact, similar to Social Security in reverse.

This historic landmark legislation has been reached because of the decades of hard work and resulting impact of national service participants and staff and the promise of President Barack Obama.

- FRAN MOYER

Some text from Nicola Goren, Acting CEO Corporation for National and Community Service

Friday, June 05, 2009

I am Declining to Sign Referendum 71; I Hope You Will Join Me

I am declining to sign petitions to place Referendum 71 on the ballot. I'm not ashamed to say that, as a married father of two children, I am not going to sign on to this referendum, which would reverse the domestic partnership bill passed by the Legislature and signed by Governor Gregoire earlier this year.

I am asking that you think before you ink, too.

Personally, I regret that many of our legislators described Senate Bill 5688 as "everything but marriage." Clearly, that isn't the case. Married and partnered couples may be equal under state law, but the State is still treating same-sex couples differently by making sure that they are not equal under federal law.
Washington State is not asking the federal government to confer the 1138 federal rights, responsibilities and benefits of marriage to these couples. These include Social Security benefits; veterans benefits; equal treatment under the tax code; and the right to sponsor non-American family members, including a spouse, for permanent residency or citizenship. -- Washblog, May 11, 2009
The final Bill Report for SB 5688 makes it all clear. ". . . the intent of the Legislature [is] to ensure that all privileges, immunities, rights, benefits, or responsibilities granted or imposed by statute to an individual because that individual is or was a spouse in a marital relationship are granted or imposed on equivalent terms to an individual because that individual is or was in a state registered domestic partnership."

To do anything less is to confer less than full rights to those who otherwise have to meet the same obligations as the rest of us. It is simply discriminatory to deny productive, tax-paying family members of their rights as the rest of us.

Referendum 71 is spearheaded by the Washington Values Alliance and their Protect Marriage Washington PAC. If Referendum 71 is exemplary of their kind of "family values," then clearly these are not my values. I personally know too many families - and children of families - headed by same-sex partners, to believe stripping them of the financial and civil rights extended by domestic partnerships is anything less than "treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit." In other words, discrimination.

I believe my values are more in line with those of Washington Families Standing Together. It was my pleasure to put my money where my mouth is, too, and support that coalition's efforts to put out the word onReferendum 71. If you feel as I do, click here and make a donation.

I have one other point to make. There are those who say that extension of these rights to those in registered domestic partnerships is a threat to marriage. I don't see it. I've been married for 22 years. Where, specifically, is the threat to my marriage? It isn't there; it's just empty rhetoric.

Sponsors of Referendum 71 have until July 25 to collect 120,577 valid voter signatures to get the measure on the Nov. 3 ballot. My signature won't be on it; I hope yours won't, either.

--MARK MESSINGER

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Bremerton Mayor and the 35th LD

Fellow 35th LD Democrats:

The Mayor of Bremerton resigned unexpectedly in the middle of campaigning for re-election, I was shocked. Bremerton has done some pretty cool things during his tenure. I haven’t agreed with everything, I would have liked to see a stronger emphasis on neighborhoods and families. However, I have liked the big steps forward. For those of you that grew up here with Leslie and me … you would not believe the downtown area. It is very cool.

So here is the big deal. The final filing date for running for this office is only about ten days away. Not one of the people that has stepped up to run makes me very happy.

Since you all know me … I am going to be very blunt. For 40 years, we watched Bremerton ebb and flow between stagnation and decline. Lots of ideas but no action. Through all of that time there has remained a spirit of community and pride. Many of us grew up here and came back as teachers, community leaders and many (like me) chose to return as business professionals.

With the encouragement of many people who care about our city, I have decided to run for Mayor of my town. For me … this is not political … it is personal. I grew up here. I cruised Pacific Ave in my 66 Mustang. I watched movies in the Roxy and the Admiral. My kids have all gone from grade school through high school here. I love and care for my community and the many friends and family that live here with me.

This is a non-partisan race. I have a platform, I have a plan and I am more then willing to go into it in detail but you know me. I have never been afraid to share my opinion. My leanings, views and “flavor” are pretty obvious.

It would be inappropriate for me to continue as the chair of the 35th LD Democrats and also run for office. As such, Nancy Frank (Vice-Chair) will take over the duties of chair.

If you want to contact me directly: daryldaugs@yahoo.com or 360.440.1947.

Thank you,
Daryl Daugs

Monday, May 18, 2009

Candidate for Bremerton Port Commissioner

35th LD and Kitsap County PCO, Roger Zabinski has announced his candidacy for the Port of Bremerton Commission.

http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/kitsap/ckr/news/45046657.html

http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2009/may/15/chico-man-plans-to-run-for-port-commission/

http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2009/may/13/chico-man-plans-to-run-for-port-commission/

He can be reached at: RogerforBremertonPort@wavecable.com

Roger Zabinski, 35th LD and Kitsap County PCO, Announces Candidacy for Port of Bremerton Commission

Roger Zabinski, a familiar face to many of us in the 35th LD, has announced his candidacy for Commissioner of the Port of Bremerton. The seat is presently held by Cheryl Kincer, who has yet to announce whether she'll run for re-election. As reported in The Kitsap Sun, "Zabinski will run on a platform of transparency in government, something the commission has been accused of not having an abundance of, especially when it approved financing for the new Bremerton Marina."
Other priorities for Zabinski include getting more boats into the Bremerton Marina, now at 31 percent capacity. He said he is studying what effect covering some of the slips would have.

Zabinski is all for the concept behind the port’s wished-for Sustainable Energy and Economic Development project, a blueprint to bring clean-tech industry to the port. He said he favors less taxation and more private-sector funding for SEED, but said he could potentially support bonding for the project.
Roger tells us he has endorsements from State Representatives Kathy Haigh, Fred Finn and Larry Seaquist.

Click here to read an article in the Central Kitsap Reporter.

Roger can be reached at: RogerforBremertonPort@wavecable.com

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Mayor Bozeman Resigns

The City of Bremerton is the intersection of three legislative districts including the 35th LD. Tuesday, Mayor Bozeman resigned unexpectedly. This leave Bremerton in a very precarious spot. Those of us who have been around town a while know that there have been big changes in the last few years. Some good and some not so good.

One thing that I know is that many of us are proud that after so many years of talk ... we have something going on.

Candidates for mayor have to file by June 5th. We need the right candidate to step up to the plate. Someone with executive experience. A person who can make the tough decisions and get people working together. A leader!

This race is going to e crucial. I am afraid that we will slip back into the days of rot and disrepair. Days where everyone talked, complained, whined and no one did anything.

Are you the right person?

Daryl Daugs, Chair
35th LD Democrats

Friday, May 08, 2009

Before You Sign Petition for I-1033, What Public Services Would You Like Cut?

Let's play a game. Let's play a game called "Responsible Citizen." This would be the game that Tim Eyman and supporters of Initiative 1033 don't want you to play.

What is I-1033? Perhaps you have already seen the signature gatherers. It's called the "Washington Lower Property Taxes Initiative." According to Ballotopedia.org:
The Washington Lower Property Taxes Initiative, also known as I-1033, will be on the November 2009 ballot in Washington, if its sponsors can collect a minimum of 241,153 signatures of registered voters by 5:00 p.m. on July 3, 2009.
Opponents are declaring that I-1033 would present a significant blow to local government spending by imposing an artificial limit on government revenue and spending for critical services. Citizens already exert a great deal of control over property taxes, in the form of votes either for or against levies. For example, in Thurston County, according to their Assessor's Office, about 40 percent of the property taxes come from excess levies approved by a vote of the people.

Back to the "Responsible Citizen" game. A responsible citizen, when confronted with an opportunity to reduce government revenue, ought to have some firm ideas as to where matching expenditures should be cut.

Look at the services your property taxes support. Click here to see where your property taxes go, if you live in Thurston County. Do you know the location of similar data, for Grays Harbor, Kitsap, or Mason counties? Click here to email me with the location and I'll post it here.

If you favor I-1033, which services, would you like to see cut? In Thurston County, more than 57% of property taxes go to education. Do we cut funding for public education? A little over 20% go to cities, towns, and the County. More than 10% to fire districts and Medic One. Do we cut funding for those services?

A recent tax levy that would support local library services was defeated. The result could be a reduction in library hours, reduced reference services, and a many fewer materials being purchased for our public library system.

Let's give a little thought, as we head into the petition season, as to what we're signing. If a responsible citizen signs a petition to reduce revenue, that citizen ought to have some specific ideas as to what public service will be cut.

Click here to visit the web site of Tim Eyman's organization.

If you favor I-1033, click on the "Comment" link, to leave comments regarding what services you would cut.

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Decline to Sign Referendum 71

In Washington, committed same sex couples and families now enjoy the same legal protections granted to married couples under state law. Or, rather, they could, if the bill passed by Democrats and signed by Governor Gregoire, is allowed to become the law of the land.

Referendum 71, if passed, would repeal many of those protections and benefits.

According to Fuse of Washington, Referendum 71 supporters "need two things from you to succeed: your signature, and your silence."

I will be giving them neither.

An email sent by Fuse continues:
There are certain moments that test what kind of people we are, both as individuals and as a community and a country. Do we believe that all people are created equal, or not? How important is fairness? Will we defend our civil rights? Our co-workers' or friends' civil rights? Or not.

We are at such a moment in Washington State.

Three years ago, these same folks tried to repeal a law that banned discrimination based on sexual orientation. That effort came up 6,000 signatures short and they never made it to the ballot.
Personally, I think it's shameful that State law cannot extend the over 1,000 federal protections of marriage to same sex families -- like social security survivors' benefits. But the law passed in this state will extend benefits like the right to collect a deceased partner's pension if the deceased was a public sector employee.

We should not go backwards on our commitments to fairness and equal rights.

I am asking you to join Fuse, Equal Rights Washington and myself in putting your name on the Yes! I Decline to Sign Pledge at http://www.fusewashington.org/page/s/declinetosign2

I'm a married father of two, who would like his daughters to live in a world where there are no second class citizens; a country where all citizens enjoy equal protection under the law. My marriage does not gain strength from depriving others of the benefits of marriage.

Please join me in speaking out against Referendum 71. Politely, but firmly, decline to sign. And talk to your family and friends about why you have decided to support fairness and equality in Washington state.

Click here to read about the referendum. And click here to read a recent opinion piece that ran in the Seattle Times.

- MARK MESSINGER

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

John Gideon 1947 - 2009

It is a sad day in the 35th Legislative District.

John Gideon has passed away. John was a long time supporter and advocate for governmental transparency and voters rights. I personally have only known John for a few years but I am honored to have know him.

I have provided a links below to two sources that knew John much better then I.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7102

http://votersunite.org/

With Respect and Honor,
Daryl Daugs, Chair 35th LD Democrats

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Is This Budget the Best We Can Expect?

From Washblog:
"Democrats' Budget: Sacrificing the Poor, Protecting the Rich"

In the run-up to the Iraq war, many of us were deeply disappointed with Congressional Democrats when we saw how ready they were to accede to the Bush administration's obvious propaganda campaign. It was if we were seeing some of these people for the first time.

Maybe it sometimes takes a crisis to understand what people are really made of. Now that state Democrats have passed their budget, we should see clearly that, in an economic crisis, they are more than ready to sacrifice the education and health care of the poor to preserve the privileges of the rich.

Under the new budget, which Governor Gregoire will certainly sign, forty thousand poor people will be disenrolled from Basic Health. In addition, sixty percent of the Student Achievement Program, which funds smaller class sizes and academic support programs, will be cut. The rich, who frequently send their children to private schools or advanced public-school programs, will find their children's futures largely untouched by this budget. The poor, however, who frequently rely on academic support classes to help their children catch up and graduate, may too often find their aspirations for their children frustrated when they can't get the education they deserve.

At the last minute, Andrew at NPI launched a Quixotic campaign to convince six progressive Democratic senators to block the impending all-cuts budget. In the end, only Sen. Ken Jacobsen proved himself to be a true progressive by voting against it. Even Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, who was among those proposing a "high incomes" income tax to offset some of the proposed cuts, voted for the budget. Sen. Kohl-Welles support of her own tax proposal was weak and uninspired, and when it finally came down to it, she sided with her colleagues in the Senate. When faced with choosing between the party of Roosevelt and the party of class privilege, she chose the latter.

As a percentage of personal income, state revenue has been declining for years, as illustrated at schmudget. According to the Institution on Taxation and Economic Policy, Washington has the most regressive state tax system in the nation. And it's been getting worse since 1989. Only if we set aside what Democrats say about themselves and how they attempt to represent their actions--almost all of what Democrats have been saying about the budget is justification anyway--can we see what the effects of their policies are. Under this budget, the number of poor people who've been denied health care and a good education will increase; the number of affluent people who will still have the advantages of wealth will not be diminished.

I'm not suggesting that state Democrats set out to turn the party over to the wealthy. Rather, their failures are those of clarity and will--all too common failures in times of fear and uncertainty. These Democrats cannot be helped any longer by words of encouragement from the party faithful. The cheerleaders of the party are an impediment to changing the fundamentally unjust class system in this state. If we want the Democrats in Olympia to change their behavior, they must be met with widespread disapproval when they return to their districts.
What do you think of the job Democrats did, in the legislature this year? If it's true that the priorities of a people ought to be reflected in the budget of their government, how well do you feel the State's budget reflects on you? Democrats didn't support an income tax, even when a group led by the father of Bill Gates called for one. What about in areas other than the budget? Because of Democrats, you condo owners and purchasers of household appliances have far better product warranties that families who purchase houses. Democrats rolled back citizen initiatives designed to move us to more renewable forms of energy, suspended voter-approved cost of living increases for teachers and reductions in school class sizes. Click on the "Comment" link below and tell us whether you think the budget reflects your values.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Fred Finn Op-Ed

From the Kitsap Sun:

Senator Tim Sheldon Recognizes Need for Self-Protection

An Op-Ed from Representative Finn in support of Senator Tim Sheldon. Well spoken.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Enroll in PSEs Green Power Program Today, Earth Day

This Earth Day is a great day for Puget Sound Energy customers to enroll in the PSE Green Power Program. PSE's voluntary Green Power Program makes it easy for homeowners and businesses to buy renewable energy. When you choose Green Power, you’ll support renewable energy projects located right here in the Pacific Northwest.

Democrats in the State Legislature have markedly reduced this state's commitment to green energy (click here and scroll to "Global Warming"). Postponing important investments in renewable energy will only harm our ability to compete and to meet our future needs with local resources. With PSE's Green Power Program, individual consumers can demonstrate a greater vision than that of our elected officials.

The additional cost for purchasing green power is $0.0125, or just over a penny, per kWh. PSE customers can participate for as little as $4 a month.

In my own case, choosing green power for all my electrical needs adds a little over $10 a month to my electric bill. My home is all electric, with a well and a heat pump. PSE's Green Power program provides me with a way of making a meaningful impact, not just on Earth Day, but every day.

PSE does not make a profit on the Green Power Program.

You can enroll your home in the PSE Green Power Program right now online (click here) or by calling a PSE Energy Advisor at 1.800.562.1482.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Obama Proposes High-Speed Rail Corridor in Pacific NW

The image to the right is a portion of President Obama's "Vision for High-Speed Rail in America." This one travels from Eugene, Oregon, to Vancouver, B.C. According to the Progressive Research Institute, here's how it would work:
$8 billion provided in the ARRA [American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, or the stimulus] and $1 billion a year for five years requested in the federal budget as a down payment to jump-start a potential world-class passenger rail system and sets the direction of transportation policy for the future.

By late summer (emphasis added), the Federal Railroad Administration will begin awarding the first round of grants.
Washington and Oregon will need to work cooperatively together to pursue that grant money. Governor Gregoire's office today announced:
[Oregon Governor] Kulongoski and I sent the Obama administration a letter applauding their bold rail vision and supporting critical infrastructure investments that will improve mobility, create and preserve jobs, and benefit air quality across our country.

Our states, along with British Columbia , have a committed partnership with BNSF [Burlington Northern Santa Fe] and Amtrak. Together, we welcome federal ARRA funds – and the jobs that we’ll create with those funds – to help advance our service and improve our infrastructure.
The Northwest Progressive Institute is reporting, "Last year, Cascades [the route picked by the Obama Administration] had its highest ridership ever, reaching nearly 775,000 passengers. That represents growth of eighty two percent in just the last ten years."

What's in it, for residents in the 35th LD? Even those living to the west of Olympia will need to drive halfway to Yelm, to reach a train station. But, this could not only provide construction jobs, it could also provide new opportunities for business from the rail corridor, west. Higher density urban development might remain closer to the I-5 and rail corridor, reducing pressure for sprawl in the southern end of the LD. And, the presence of robust federal funding may help the State legislature to consider ways to fund public transit solutions which leverage off the presence of the high-speed rail corridor.

What do you think about Obama's high-speed rail initiative? Leave your comments below.